How to thwart a bill in three easy steps
PETRO GEORGIOU – The Age – October 24, 2009
THAT legendary fictional bureaucrat, Sir Humphrey Appleby, has choreographed how governments stifle an unwanted legislative proposal. Step one – ignore it. If it persists, move to step two, deflect and defer. If it is still standing, move to the third, terminal step. Embrace it in a godfatherly clinch, hold it close while slipping on the legislative garrotte. Watching this on television can be entertaining. Seeing it in real life isn’t. The garrotte is now being used to choke the emergence of an independent reviewer of the terrorist laws.
The executive has pretty much had its way in getting the laws it wants to fight terrorism. Since the al-Qaeda attacks of 2001, 49 counter-terrorist laws have been passed. Some of the executive excesses have been blocked by the Parliament. Unquestionably, however, the past eight years have witnessed a strengthening in police and security powers and a curbing of freedoms and legal protections against the state.
As the surge of terror laws continued, legislators and government-appointed inquiries have increasingly pressed for an independent and ongoing review of these laws, including their effectiveness and fairness.
The Government has now introduced the National Security Monitor Bill, which it claims reflects the recommendations for an independent reviewer. Nothing could be further from the truth…
The bedrock of all the recommendations for a reviewer is independence from executive control and censorship, freedom to determine priorities, and examine all terrorism laws. Independence requires the ability to report publicly to Parliament, subject to not prejudicing national security, operations or trials.
The monitor bill fundamentally negates every element of statutory independence. It deploys every legislative artifice, legal and symbolic, to neuter the monitor…
The monitor bill is a travesty, but it is not a joke. The avalanche of terrorist laws since 2001 has radically curbed the protection of the individual. To safeguard our democracy, strong, independent and ongoing scrutiny of these laws and their operation is needed. The Government’s monitor is a subverted safeguard. If this legislation passes into law, the monitor will effectively be handcuffed, gagged and tied to the whim of the government…
Petro Georgiou is the member for Kooyong.
via How to thwart a bill in three easy steps – theage.com.au
Posts
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.